How did you offend the GM enough to deserve this? |
Reading through ACKS makes it clear that its designed as the classic, "fate worse than death" combat result. It really drains levels, and everything that comes with them: spells, proficiencies, max health, attack bonuses, and all special class abilities. And there are no standard restoration-like spells that restore it either. Here's a quote from the rules: "The effect can only be reversed with ritual magic, such as the 9th level mage ritual wish."
A variety of methods have been used over multiple editions of D&D to reduce the horrible effects of life draining attacks:
- providing a spell to cure it (AD&D and all later editions)
- allowing an initial saving throw (3rd edition)
- allowing multiple saving throws (3.5 and Pathfinder)
- letting it wear off over a period of time (4th edition and Next)
- replacing it with stat drain effects (also 4th edition)
At the moment, I'm leaning toward two changes that reduce the bookkeeping and permanency of an energy drain, but maintain its overall status as a worse-than-death fate:
- Limiting the effect to a "permanent negative level" that only affects max health (-1 HD per negative level) and any 1d20 throws for attacks/saves/abilities (-1 per negative level). No loss of knowledge or experience, only of vigor. A character will still die (and possibly become undead) if negative levels exceed positive levels, or if max health becomes negative.
- Adding an aging effect that increases age by a number of years equal to 10% of the current age, rounding up. (A 25 year old character will age by 3 years.) This can potentially cause stat reductions or even death, as listed in the table for age brackets by race.
- Providing a standard 6th level divine ritual that reverses the "negative level" effect (not the aging effect!), as an alternative the 9th level of a wish spell. This restoration ritual requires a material component taken from the particular caster or undead creature that inflicted the energy drain.
That's more nasty than the current rule in some ways (aging is a very permanent way to die!), but less nasty in other ways (no excessive bookkeeping work, and a plot-driving path to reverse it). It also makes anti-aging magic (like the fabled Philosopher's Stone) fiercely coveted, which feels authentic from a literary standpoint.
No comments:
Post a Comment